🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."